Let the boss win. Maybe this is the only way to quickly get promoted and become an excellent employee...? by Nada 20231027

Hello. This is Nada from Seito Medical School. This time's theme is about business. eh? Is business like selling expensive pots? that's right. We don't have expensive pressure points as products, but instead we have products called information. Maybe it's an information product... yes. We would like to provide you with a plan that suits you.

If you have a boss, which would you rather have: a plan that lets your boss win or a plan that doesn't let your boss win? I think this is a major turning point in the life of a businessman. If you are a businessman, you belong to some kind of organization, and of course there is a boss even in non-profit organizations such as NPOs (non-profit organizations) and NGOs (non-governmental organizations). Nowadays, there are young people who don't want to get promoted, so the responsibility of the boss is very important.

Regarding the previous question, should you let your boss win or not? I would recommend a plan that lets your boss win. This is because if a boss is promoted, he or she will try to take his or her superior or favorite subordinates with him or her. What you can do to achieve this is to polish your own leather shoes and hone your skills to help your boss win. For me, the quickest way to get promoted is to hone your own skills and use those skills to improve your boss's performance.

If you were your boss, what kind of subordinate would you want to motivate? He is very serious, and even if he is clumsy, no boss would be harsh on a subordinate who desperately tries to make him win. This also applies to me, but I can say that you need to make an effort to win over your superiors in a variety of areas, including not only your relationship with your boss at the company, but also your relationship with customers, your relationship with doctors, and so on. Even if the other person is in a higher position, I sometimes continue to whine until I get it, so I often ask myself why things came to be like that, what my boss is thinking right now, and how I feel as a subordinate. I think a person who can instantly guess what they should do is a good person.

There are times when I get frustrated when my parents don't buy me sweets, but I personally wish I could at least ask my parents why they can't buy me sweets, as far as a child can think. , I can say that I have grown. Due to the relationship between boss and subordinate, we are friends who are walking the same path. Since that friend is giving you instructions, it must be important to you as well. Do you have a good relationship with your boss? It would be a waste if the relationship ended up with one person dominating the other.

First, listen to your boss. If you ask your boss a question, he or she will tell you why he or she thinks that way. Let your boss win. If you approach things with that mindset, your boss might take you to a higher level. See you soon.

Use a formula with a difference of twice on both sides. It would be sad if the boss of that large company was paid more than twice as much. by Nada 20231024

Hello. This is Nada from Seito Medical School. There are various combinations of calculations for A=B and C=D. It's a restaurant that has so many combinations that it's hard to order.

Adding A=B and C=D gives A+C=B+D. If we subtract A=B and C=D, we get AC=BD. When multiplied, AC=BD or AD=BC. When divided, A/C=B/D.

If (A/B)=(C/D) is A=1, B=3, C=2, D=6, (1/3)=(2/6) is also correct, but C is twice as much as A, and D is twice as much as B. In other words, (2/2) x (1/3) = (2/6).

In this state, if (A/B) = (C/D), we can derive A=C between the numerators and B=D between the denominators. However, please note that the correct answer is Ax2=C, which means 1×2=2. Regarding B=D, Bx2=D and 3×2=6.

However, here we purposely use an equation with a difference of two times on both sides. It would be sad if the boss of that large company was paid more than twice as much. It would have been twice as good...

First, add both sides of A=C and B=D. A+B=C+D. This will look like this: A+B=1+3=4, C+D=2+6=8. Therefore, the state where there is a difference of 2 times on both sides will be preserved. Of course, even if AB=CD, 1×3=2×6 and 3=12, so the difference is 4 times. Multiplying the 2x difference twice will give you a 4x difference.

So far, things are good, but from here on out, we are currently researching. Sample below.

(A+B) x D=(C+D) x B

(1+3) x 6 = (2+6) x 3

The above was a sample. Have a nice day tomorrow. See you soon.

If a person whose contribution was positive becomes a negative contribution, it will cause double damage by Nada 20231023

Hello. This is Nada from Seito Medical School. I want to express business administration using mathematical formulas. For example, there are theories about students' study time. For students, input time is time for studying, and output time is time for solving problems. One thing to keep in mind here is that once words are spoken, they cannot be taken back. Regarding this, I would like to write another article on the theme of turning a crisis into an opportunity.

Well, I don't think there is such a thing as wasted time. Even the time you spend absentmindedly, which may seem like a waste, may be necessary time to clear your head. On top of that, let's make an assumption that, conversely, there is no time to waste. Time spent inputting knowledge is wasting time that could be used to do something.

This is a double waste. In other words, wasted input time increases skill by +0. In other words, there is nothing to be gained. On top of that, time is consumed, so the time becomes -α (minus alpha).

Even if there is time for all inputs, it is divided into time for wasted input and time for necessary input. In other words,

Time for all inputs TI (total input)

= time for wasted inputs nI (not inputs) + time for necessary inputs I (inputs)

,

TI = nI + I = inefficiency

Here, as I mentioned earlier, if the required work time is wt (work time), then

wt = nI

. In this example, wt would solve the problem. Assign wt to nI of TI.

TI = Tw (total working) = wt + I = efficient

. Here, there is also a way of thinking that nI is -nI. Think about why you do it. Using this kind of thinking, it would be possible to replace business administration or liberal arts subjects with mathematical formulas.

Finally, apply actual numbers to explain how wasted input time is doubly wasted.

TI=8

, which means 8 hours of input. Of these, 6 hours are considered necessary input, and 2 hours are considered wasteful input.

TI = nI + I = 2 + 6

Since 2 hours are wasted, the result of work is 6 hours.

Let's turn this wasted input into necessary work time wt.

wt = 2

TI = wt + I = 2 + 6 = 8The

work result is 8 hours, but compared to when the work result was 6 hours, when the work result was 6 hours, the work result was 2 hours. I don't have much time and I wasted 2 hours. That's two hours less, both in terms of work results and wasted time.

The idea here may be a little difficult. It might be a good idea to consider that 2 hours of wasted input will take away 2 hours of your physical strength. I have to rest for another two hours to recover my strength. If we end up with a minus 2 hours instead of zero when we should have added 2 hours, then (-2) + (-2) = -4, and we can say that we have wasted 4 hours. If something that was originally a plus becomes a minus, the portion that can be considered profit will be greatly burdened.

For example, if an employee who used to be an asset at a company becomes a window employee who only receives a salary, then what used to be a plus has now become a minus, resulting in double damage. If this employee were to contribute even just a small amount to the company's sales and make a positive difference, it would no longer be double damage. In other words, it will be a single loss.

In business administration, by expressing things in mathematical formulas like this, we may be able to see things that were previously invisible. Words that come out of your mouth cannot be taken back. I guess I also need to take responsibility for the content of this article. have a nice day. See you soon.

In economics, which is more important: quantity adjustment or price adjustment? For products that are selling well, you can freely adjust the quantity and price by Nada 20231022

Hello. This is Nada from Seito Medical School. This time, we will be talking about quantity adjustment and price adjustment, which have different perspectives in macroeconomics and microeconomics. When a lot of things are sold, the difference is whether to increase the quantity while keeping the price the same, or to raise the price and seek more profits.

I may talk a little passionately about this quantity adjustment and price adjustment this time. Or maybe he will release an epic fantasy story after Hotaru no Hikari. For those times, grab a cup of coffee and have a good time. yo, Chekeracho! !

One question in economics is whether quantity adjustment or price adjustment is better. This also has long-term and short-term implications. In the short term, when sales of goods increase in the market, the cost of goods includes things that cannot be easily lowered or increased, such as wages, so factories respond by increasing production. This is what is called a quantity adjustment. On the other hand, in the long term, it can be said to be a price adjustment because the expenses such as wages, which are the main factors in prices, are adjusted over a long period of time in response to market movements.

The field of economics that focuses on quantitative adjustment and focuses on the short term is called macroeconomics. On the other hand, the field of economics that focuses on price adjustment and the long term is called microeconomics. Keynes, the founder of macroeconomics, famously said, ``In the long run, everyone is dead.'' Adjusting prices is difficult. Dear readers, the prices of things are rising due to the recent price rush (October 2023). When the price of this item increases, it is called inflation.

So, is the current period of long-term price adjustment?The current inflation can be said to be caused by a rise in the cost of producing goods, which is called a cost push. One reason is that oil prices are rising due to the conflict in Ukraine. Of course, the economy is not bad, so it can be said that there is some demand inflation where consumption leads to consumption.

If the product sells, increase the price. If the product doesn't sell, lower the price. This is the idea of ​​general equilibrium, but it's not quite the opposite; if a product sells, lower the price and increase sales. You can see that the idea that if a product does not sell, raise the price and increase profits is not wrong. However, since economics emphasizes a balanced and stable economy such as general equilibrium, general equilibrium theory can be said to be the more mainstream way of thinking.

The economics that focuses on this microscopic general equilibrium theory is called the ``new classical'' or ``monetarist'' economics. By the way, macroeconomics is called "Keynesian".

Now, onto the main topic. Regarding my opinion, whether quantity adjustment or price adjustment is better, I think it would be good to have the option of trying both. For example, what about a plan like this? When a product sells, the price is lowered through price adjustment. A fall in the price of a selling product means a further increase in market share and an increase in total profit. Here, profit is sales - expenses = profit. Lowering the price will reduce the profit per product, but it is assumed that it is possible to increase the overall profit while maintaining the profit rate by adjusting the quantity. In other words, you can improve your company's performance by adjusting quantities and prices on a case-by-case basis.

However, in the short term, prices are fixed, so I think it is too simplistic to use quantity adjustment. Because it is a short-term project, it is impossible to rebuild factories to increase production in a short period of time, so price adjustment may be more appropriate. On the other hand, in the long term, there is enough time to rebuild the factory, so it can be said that it is suitable for volume adjustment.

On the other hand, in the short term, it can be said that adjusting the quantity or price is not suitable because the price is fixed and there is no time to set up a factory. On the other hand, in the long term, both price and quantity adjustments are possible.

Furthermore, products that sell are subject to both quantity and price adjustments, but products that do not sell are not subject to either quantity or price adjustment.

What we have seen so far makes us wonder whether what is said to be true in economics is really true, and whether what is assumed is a bias on the part of academics. I believe that the correct approach here is to think about it until you are completely convinced. I guess you could call it a critical spirit.

This is Hotaru no Hikari. I think it's best to be flexible when it comes to quantity and price adjustments. What I'm more curious about is that I previously wrote an article about what A=B and C=D are. What if we applied this idea to economics?

For example, the quantity theory of money is interesting. The formula MV=PT is called the quantity theory of money. M: Money supply, V: Money circulation velocity, P: Prices, T: Real GDP. In other words, if the amount of currency M goes around the market V times, T, which is real GDP when the price is P, will be the same amount. By the way, GDP is the total amount of products produced by a country in one year. MV is the currency side and PT is the value side of the produced goods, but we divide this into M=T and V=P. Then, what happens if we multiply the two equations again and rewrite the equation as MP=VT? Honestly, it's a little interesting.

Here, the original formula for the quantity theory of money is, in Japan, M = M3 = 1,467 trillion yen, T = real GDP = 555 trillion yen, and M/T = P/V = 2.63. The new rearranged formula is MP=VT, so M/T=V/P, and V/P=2.63. The original formula P=2.63V, and the rearranged formula P=V/2.63. Does this make sense? I'd like to post another article about A=B and C=D, so stay tuned. See you soon.

What are macroeconomics and microeconomics? Adding micro does not necessarily add up to macro by Nada 20231021

Hello. This is Nada from Seito Medical School. This time we will talk about macroeconomics. Economics. Yeah. Economics is also a subject that I have a lot of fondness for. When you think of economics, the first thing that comes to mind is balance or equilibrium theory. If demand increases, the price will increase. When supply increases, price decreases. That's an example of that. Economics consists of macroeconomics and microeconomics, and the field of micro-foundation of macroeconomics integrates these two seemingly contradictory academic fields. I'm trying to. In the end, this micro-foundation seems to be motivated by the desire to simulate market movements, and science is the study of ``prediction'' that ultimately results in something that simulates nature.

Now, let's talk about the relationship between macroeconomics and microeconomics. Brother? If someone says this to you, it might be a good idea to respond by saying that they're siblings who don't look alike at all.

First, what is economics? The main purpose of economics is to equitably distribute the earth's limited resources, such as metals and oil. Iron and oil are limited resources. In economics, everyone has things that cannot be obtained by everyone, such as air and water, but water is one of the few precious resources in desert areas. In economics, something that is rare and valuable is called scarcity. Markets exist to fairly distribute these scarce resources to many people.

In the market, goods are exchanged using currency, or money. In macroeconomics, the major players that exchange money are households, businesses, and governments. These three players use the causes of market economy movements, that is, movements in economic variables such as economic size, employment, prices, and interest rates. It is the responsibility of macroeconomics to study things related to the economy as a whole, such as inflation, economic growth rates, and booms and busts. In macroeconomics, the purpose of government policies related to the economy, that is, economic policies, is to stabilize price movements and economic growth rates.

Stabilizing means balancing, a state that is neither extremely good nor extremely bad. For example, the idea that the higher the economic growth rate is, the better it is because the number of wealthy people increases can be countered by saying that a high economic growth rate causes inflation and heats up the economy, making people's lives more unstable. In fact, as the economy grows and inflation occurs, the prices of goods and goods rise before wages, so some people may find their lives temporarily difficult.

In this way, macroeconomics deals with the economy as a whole, that is, the economy of a country. On the other hand, in microeconomics, individual players, such as a household or a company, are the subject of analysis. As for the market, according to general equilibrium theory, as I mentioned earlier, when the number of people who want something increases, that is, when the demand increases, the value of the item increases, and when the number of people who want something decreases, that is, when the demand decreases, the value of the item increases. value decreases.

In this way, if microeconomics is an individual discipline and macroeconomics is an overall discipline, then economics is divided into microeconomics and macroeconomics. In that case, the method of microeconomics, which looks at individual players as a whole, or macroeconomics, is called reductionism. The idea is that if you add each part together, you can see it as a whole.

Alternatively, there is a non-reductive theory that treats macroeconomics as macroeconomics and microeconomics as microeconomics, and treats each separately. The basis for this claim is, for example, the fallacy of composition.

The fallacy of composition refers to an economic phenomenon in which the actions of the individual and the actions of the whole are different. For example, if an individual tries hard to save, the amount they save may increase, but if people save as a whole, consumption will decrease, wages will decrease, and in the end, the amount saved will not increase.

In other words, there are parts of microeconomics and macroeconomics in which different economic laws (market principles) are at work, and I believe that the sum of microeconomics does not simply constitute macroeconomics. I also believe that microeconomics and macroeconomics involve different mechanisms, and I do not believe that simply adding up the players in microeconomics will result in the movement of macroeconomics as a whole.

This is Hotaru no Hikari. Readers who saw the article on physiology that I posted a while back may know that the idea of ​​looking at the whole as a collection of individuals is a general idea in science, just as it is in economics. I don't know. If you think about it normally, I think it is an obvious fact for everyone that the movement of individual brain cells and the function of the brain as a whole are different.

On top of that, just as physiology is said to be a discipline of integration, I believe that it is also the aspiration of economics to integrate microeconomics and macroeconomics. The challenge of modern economics, which is to provide a micro-foundation to macroeconomics, stems from this awareness of the problem.

I put too much emphasis on explaining things as a reflection on this article, and I lacked humor. I'm reflecting on this a little. Based on that, I would like to respond well to the next challenge. Thank you to everyone who read this article. I hope you have a good day today. See you soon.

virtual world and real world. Digital and objects If you want to take your blog from the virtual world to reality, let’s all go hiking by Nada 20231019

Hello. This is Nada from Seito Medical School. Virtual world. Yeah. It feels like something like fate. When I think of a virtual world, I imagine a completely cheat fantasy world. This is also true, but fantasy is a complete cheat and is the world of anime and manga. It's a golden land far away from the real world, with dragons and slimes. I want to say Is the virtual world really real?

In games and manga, it's natural, but in a virtual world, it doesn't have enough seasoning, which is frustrating. The incident that made this virtual world a hot topic was Bitcoin. Until now, the virtual world was the world on TV. When talking about Bitcoin, many people probably remember that there was an incident where a large amount of Bitcoin was stolen from an exchange. I was reminded of the medal dropping that I was obsessed with when I was a child, and Bitcoin's medal dropping seems to be extreme. After all, 1 Bitcoin is worth millions of yen. When it comes to games, I've been thinking a lot about whether there's a way to alchemize a large amount of game coins into the real world. It's a nostalgic summer memory. When it comes to game coins, I'm really interested in how many Yukichi-san can be exchanged for 1 gold.

Bitcoin is a jewel that came out of the virtual world called digital, but the virtual world is meant to be enjoyed, and until now it was not something that could be used to make a profit. However, I feel that the boundaries between reality and virtual worlds such as Bitcoin and the Metaverse are disappearing these days. If this blog is also a virtual world in the digital sense, if bloggers go to a BBQ together, the real world and virtual world will be linked. As an extension of this, advertising can also be considered a kind of virtual world.

Products are introduced through advertisements, but advertisements are information that cannot be touched. Of course, some people may point out that you can touch flyers with your hands, but there is no big difference between online advertisements and paper flyers, as they are essentially data. On top of that, the magic trick of pulling a radish out of a 100 yen radish flyer is still impossible.

Returning to the topic of blogs, it is up to the blog owner to link their cherished blogs with the real world. A virtual world called anonymous is not necessarily a good thing. Showing your face, exposing your name, and picking up fans becomes your entrance to the real world. In that sense, the virtual world we are talking about here is not a fantasy world, but a digital world.

This is Hotaru no Hikari. The virtual world means that it is linked to the real world, and it is a collaboration of data and objects. However, it is up to you to decide whether to weight that link closer to the virtual world or to the real world. If the virtual world isn't enough for you to have fun, why not set up a place and go hiking with your fans and readers? Of course, it might be polite for you to prepare the BBQ set yourself. I hope it goes well. See you soon.

I said that if you sleep on a hard carpeted floor, you can wake up comfortably within 5 or 6 hours by Nada 20231019

Hello. This is Nada from Seito Medical School. I basically slept in bed during the summer. I felt comfortable sleeping on the bed, so I was able to sleep for a long time. However, it was difficult to wake up, and it was common for me to go back to sleep twice or three times. I think a bed is a comfortable item for resting. Beds don't take up much space in the room and you can store things underneath. On the other hand, in Japan, we have something called a kotatsu, and during kotatsu season, I always sleep in a kotatsu on the carpeted floor. Sleeping on the floor isn't as comfortable as a bed, but it can feel a little hard when you lie down.

The reason why I sleep on the floor instead of in bed is because I wake up more easily. If I don't have an alarm in bed, I can easily sleep for 12 hours. However, if you sleep on the carpet for 5 or 6 hours with a futon over your head, you will wake up feeling refreshed. However, there is surprisingly no discomfort due to the hardness of the floor. One of the key points of sleeping on the floor is that you can wake up comfortably within those 5 or 6 hours. Probably, if you sleep soundly, you won't sleep twice or three times. If it's kotatsu season, you can also sleep with the kotatsu on. By the way, if I sleep in my kotatsu with the power on, I'll wake up within 2-3 hours. I think the good thing about it is that you can wake up refreshed, whether it's at a kotatsu or on the floor. When you wake up, you can have a pleasant morning by drinking a cup of coffee that you prepared before going to bed. I sleep on my bed in the summer, but in the winter I sleep on the floor with a kotatsu. I think it depends on each person which one is better, so try both. I'm sure you'll be surprised at the difference. See you soon.