Q. How do you enjoy your leisure time? A. I don't have any vacation, but I hope you all enjoy your free time and have a special experience.

Hello. This is Inishie Destiny from Seito Medical School. "It's a way to enjoy your vacation." I don't have any vacations in general. Even during New Year's, I'm on a normal schedule 365 days a year. On top of that, if I had a vacation, what would I enjoy? 

If I had a day off, I would like to go to a festival. Because my life is usually filled with work, I want to have a special experience on my days off. But sadly, it's been so long since I last went to a summer festival. It's not that I don't like festivals, but I just didn't feel the need to go. 

Or I would like to go to a resort and walk by the hotel pool or on the sandy beach. However, please bear with me as I am about to tell you a story that is not exactly a dream. I say that I want to go to summer festivals and go to resorts, but I don't think I would be able to enjoy the experience if I went to such entertainment facilities because I would be working all the time.

I'm constantly checking my phone or computer to see if there's work I need to get done. You might say, "It's important to switch between on and off. Working at a resort is a waste of money."

I think so too. Since you've come all the way here to have fun, turn off your smartphone and computer and have fun. However, even if I go swimming for fun, I'll get bored of the experience in a day. Above all, work is more exciting and fun. 

My hobby is blogging, so I certainly enjoy it, but I don't think I would enjoy writing if I were to mass-produce writing that nobody would read. I can keep working hard because there is someone who reads my articles. 

In that sense, I and my readers are having fun through the blog. You can have fun in an online environment without huge pool equipment or food stalls. I want to say, is it really necessary to separate on and off when it comes to vacation? 

People who don't like work may say that a life of work is boring. However, if work itself becomes play, you don't need a vacation every day. In other words, you can enjoy a fun and never-boring vacation every day. 

I want to tell everyone to enjoy their free time and refresh themselves to the fullest. However, I would like to ask one more favor. I would like to ask you to change your perspective on the work that you do to earn your daily living.

This will free you from the daily routine of waiting for leisure time and allow you to appreciate the wonderfulness of your daily life. If you have time off from work, try doing something special. Although it's fine to just sleep on vacation, try to do something you wouldn't normally be able to do.

This will bring about synergy with your work and allow you to spend your time more meaningfully. However, it is different for everyone. No matter how much I say that you need to make efforts to enjoy your work, there are also serious professionals who say that work is not play. 

There are many different people and many different ways of thinking. What I have said today is merely my opinion. However, I'm sure there are many people who think how great it would be if they could enjoy their work like they enjoyed playing.

Human life expectancy is likely to continue to increase. In the future, work will become one of the major pillars of life. I would like to give you an opportunity. First, please imagine yourself doing well at work.

Then, use your brain desperately to think about how you can make the current situation better. When you do, the door to a new world will appear before you. Good luck. See you later.

Q.What did you cherish when you were a child? A. Toys such as card games, and now my body, which I put effort and time into, is a treasure.

What was the most important thing to you as a child? It was Seito Medical School's Inishie Destiny. When I was in elementary school, I enjoyed card games, manga, and games, but now all I have are the leftover normal cards that my parents sold without my permission. 

I may have been angry about this, but when I found out, I was strangely calm. "Oh, so she sold it, mother. If you take the M away, you're a stranger." But for me, it was a good opportunity. 

If you become an adult and keep your favorite toys forever, it means you haven't become a full-grown adult yet. It's in the way, it's in the way. In that sense, I have a backup of this blog, but I might be quite annoyed if my parents reset it.

I'll be fine if I hide my computer in the attic. My toy now is my blog. I'm prepared to keep writing until I die, but I'd like to find someone to take over this blog after I retire. It's not a big blog yet though.

The added article is the secret blog. The things that were important to me as a child are not the things I take out and look at every time, but the toys that I occasionally remember and reminisce about if they are in a storage case in my dresser.

Of course, there were many rare cards in my collection, so if I had kept them, they might have become very expensive. Sorry about the cards. Children's values ​​and adult values ​​are very different, but children have their own ethics and sense of justice, and adults have the same.

Children are inexperienced and cannot see through the essence of things, and they only think about the immediate future. Just like the marshmallow test, life is like a chicken race, and the more you pull, the bigger the payout when you win.

Buy! Buy! Buy as much as you can! Investments also increase profits exponentially. Every time you win, the amount of profit you receive will be greater than proportional to the exponential curve. If you make a 30% profit every year, you will get 1.3^10=13.7 times the amount in 10 years, but in 20 years, you will get 190 times the amount.

Where is the fantasy product that will make 30% every year!? If you don't release it, I'll pick your eyeballs. It may be difficult to make a 30% profit every year from an investment, but it's a good example of an exponential growth that snowballs. 

How to resist the temptation to waste time and keep trying. When I was a child, I loved playing card games. I had endless time.

However, what I value as an adult is time and effort as self-investment. It has changed from something I can touch to something I can't touch as an adult. That's all. Well then.

Medical School Rewrite! 20230109 An authoritative leader and an emphatic manager work together to handle matters

Hello. This is Inishie Destiny from Seito Medical School. From now on, I will be posting rewritten articles from the medical school and articles written in an easy-to-understand way so that even elementary school students can understand them. The theme of this article is authority.

It can be said that it is a basic skill that bigwigs are equipped with. In an article about authority for adults, when you hear the word authority, you imagine a B-grade horror movie with merciless carnage. What is authority? In my opinion, it is a way to control others through fear. Ah, it's scary.

By having military power, an organization such as a nation can prevent terrorist acts such as rebellions. It is easy to control people through fear. However, it can also be said that authority can only sit in its relax chair if it has a minimum level of support. 

Authority or support? I think either is fine. When you are unknown at the very beginning, it is difficult to gain support, so you need to be in a position such as a title. However, as you gain positions and experience, you will gradually gain support and trust.

Authority as a position turns into support. Support gives you a bigger position, which leads to more support. If it is beneficial to society, authority will also become like Mito Komon. Can't you see this?!

That being said, there are leaders and managers in the world. Both are management positions, but a leader shows the vision to those around them. A manager's job is to develop human resources and raise the motivation of those around them.

I want my manager to learn words that motivate me so that he can motivate me. What words motivate me? That's it.

In my opinion, leaders and managers have their pros and cons, and I have an image of leaders as strong people. They are the ones who pull others along and give them an opportunity. When a leader shows a vision, it becomes possible for a larger organization to achieve results, rather than just individuals. 

Managers are accommodative people, so rather than being cooperative leaders, they can be seen as managers who create cooperative relationships in the workplace. In this case, which of the leader and the manager should be the boss? More specifically, which should have the power? 

The only absolute law that is generally correct is that people grow old and die. However, one possible pattern is that a manager whose job is to cooperate with others should act as a stopper for a leader whose job is to achieve results. 

The leader can try his hand at flipping the table like the stubborn old men of old, but this means that there needs to be someone to hold the table down at the moment it is flipped.

No, that doesn't make sense. Some people may say that, but the leader is the company's main earner. No matter what others say, a little selfishness is acceptable, but when it's about to develop into a fatal mistake, the power of the top to stop it is needed. 

I expect this top authority to be a manager. If the stereotype of a selfish leader is true, then by adjusting the selfish leader, they will be able to make up for the shortcomings of their selfishness and fully demonstrate their abilities.

To sum up, I think it would be good if the leader's main job was to make a lot of money and let the employees have good dreams, and the manager was there to coordinate that. I always think it would be great if there were two people at the top and we could build a relationship where the two tops complement each other.

It may be difficult to find a leader who excels in both managerial coordination and practical skills as a player, but there must be leaders who excel in only one of them. As I have said many times before, this is about managers in a single organization.

It's not a universal story that can be used anywhere, like a goldfish candy. Let's just say that it's just one role pattern. However, if a strong leader and a manager who can coordinate work together, it's like a golden club for a demon.

I would like to see the battle scenes of that game on an LCD screen. 

[Article about authority for children]. When you hear authority, you probably imagine a really scary and crappy horror movie. What is authority? In my opinion, it is a way to control the other person through fear. Oh, so scary.

A nation, a group of people, also has weapons to protect itself from attacks by other nations and its own people. It is easy to control people through the fear of weapons and other things.

However, it can also be said that authority can only sit in its relaxing chair if it has the necessary support. Does authority come first, or does it come first to be supported? I think either is fine.

When you first start out as an unknown, it's difficult to gain support, so you need to assume a role or a position. However, as you gain more roles and experience, you will gradually gain support and trust.

The authority of a position changes into support. Support gives a larger role, which in turn leads to more support. If it is beneficial to society, then authority also becomes like Mito Komon. Can't you see this?!

Role → Experience → Support → Mito Komon 

That being said, there are leaders and managers in the world. Both have the role of bringing people together, but a leader's job is to talk about the vision to those around them. A manager's job is to develop the people in the company and motivate them.

I want my manager to learn words that motivate me so that I can be motivated. What words motivate me? That's it. For me, leaders and managers have good and bad points, and I have the image that leaders are strong.

A leader is someone who pulls others along and gives them motivation. By showing a vision, a leader can achieve results not just as a single person, but as a larger organization.

A manager's role is to bring people together, so you can see them as creating relationships in the workplace that bring people together. In this case, which should be higher, the leader or the manager? More specifically, which should have the power?

There is no one absolute law that is correct in the world other than that we grow old and die. However, one pattern is that it may be good for managers, whose job is to bring people together, to act as a checkerboard for leaders, whose job is to produce results. 

The leader can challenge the others with his special move of flipping the table, like the stubborn old men of old, but this means that there will be someone to hold the table down when it is flipped.

No, that doesn't make sense. Some people may say that, but a leader is someone who increases the company's money. No matter what others say, some selfishness is tolerated, but when it seems like you're heading towards a big mistake, you need a top authority to stop it. I expect this top authority to be a manager.

If this is your idea of ​​a selfish leader, then by bringing the selfish leader together, you will be able to cover up the negative aspects of the selfish part and allow them to fully utilize their abilities. 

To summarise what we've discussed so far, I think the leader should be expected to increase the money vigorously and make it their main job to make people at work dream big, with a manager to coordinate this.

I always think it would be great if there were two top people who could create a relationship where they could improve each other. It may be difficult to find a top person who is both excellent at managing as a manager and excellent at playing as a player, but there must be a top person who is outstanding in just one of them.

As I have said many times before, this is a story about how to bring a group of people together. It is not a typical story that can be taken anywhere, like the "Kintaro" candy. Let me just say that it is just one pattern.

However, if a strong leader and a manager who can coordinate things work together, it's like a deadly combination. I'd like to see the battle scenes of that game on my smartphone screen.

Q.What do you think about living a long life? A.Whether you want to live a long time depends on the person, but I want to live a long life, so I am pursuing research as part of that effort.

Hello. This is Inishie Destiny from Seito Medical School. I would like to talk about the topic "What do you think about living a very long life?"

 I think it takes a long time of hard work to live a very long life. Even if the oldest person alive today were to reach 120 years old, I don't think they would reach that age. You can find out the current oldest person by looking in the Guinness Book of World Records, but I think people today would die of old age by the time they reach 120 years old. 

Perhaps the organs in the body would rot, which would be fatal. I think that as we get older, we get wrinkles, we shrink, and various other "causes of death" occur. Even if aging is caused by oxidation or glycation, we would not believe that we could extend our lifespan by being that careful.

If oxidation and glycation are suppressed, cells will be activated and people will live longer, but that is just one aspect of it. Recently, when I read online news, I often see news that says that wild animals do not age.

This means that wild birds and butterflies do not live long enough to live out their lifespan, and of course, if you look at pet dogs and cats, the slow aging decline that occurs with long-term captivity is common. 

It's not that wild animals don't age, but rather that wild dogs and cats cannot live for 15 or 20 years, and therefore cannot live long enough for their internal organs to rot. In the first place, even a minor illness or tooth decay can be a life-or-death blow to wild animals.

We humans, dogs, and cats can see a doctor and receive appropriate medicine and surgery, so we rarely die from minor illnesses. The difference between wild animals and humans is probably whether they live in a protected environment or not.

This alone is the difference between many wild animals who die within a year and humans who can live up to nearly 120 years. Following this logic, if humans want to live to be 200, 300 or even 500 years old, they need something other than a protected environment.

It could be a therapeutic environment that cures any disease, or a special way of taking in nutrients, or a method of maintaining bones and muscles. I believe that for human aging, antioxidants such as vitamin C and a special way of taking in carbohydrates, which are sugars, are important at the skin and cellular levels.

Of course, if we think about the fact that we get shorter as we age, that is, our bones get shorter, we worry about calcium deficiency. Or, there may be more advanced reasons why people get shorter. 

Even if we could live a long life, if we were bedridden or looked horrible, we might not choose to continue living. If we could live a long life but not have any romantic relationships, we might wonder if we really need to live a long life.

I think it's not bad to live a long life if you have hobbies and things to enjoy other than love. However, if your life is too long, you may get bored of something, such as being bored with being alive. When it comes to getting nutrients, I think a baby's diet can provide a hint.

As the name suggests, babies grow by drinking milk if they are mammals. At least we humans can survive on milk alone when we are babies. Milk is said to be a complete nutritional food, and it contains a wide variety of nutrients.

For example, the carton of milk I am holding in my hand right now contains the following information (per 200ml glass): energy 140kcal, carbohydrates 9.5g, protein 6.8g, salt equivalent 0.2g, fat 8.3g, and calcium 230mg.

At the very least, we can say that we need this amount of nutrients to survive. An interesting thing to do would be to look at the daily nutrient requirements of an adult and find out how many ml of milk you would need to drink to survive on milk alone.

Is it possible for an adult to live on milk alone? It sounds like an interesting endeavor. 

So I've been writing about this for a long time, but when it comes to living a long life, I think if a person wants to live a long life, they should make an effort to do so. Try various things, come up with your own theory, and put it into practice.

The outcome is whether or not we can exceed our maximum lifespan, but whether or not we can find value in it. I would like to establish my own anti-aging theory based on the ideas I have written so far. I would like to disclose the results of my research on this blog. 

It's almost 7am and time for everyone to wake up. I'm a night owl and I work late at night, so it might be interesting to think about whether being a morning person or a night owl will help me live longer. 

That's it for Hotaru no Hikari. My blog may contain a lot of information, but I think there is still a lot of space to fill in between the lines. My sentences are too concise, so I think it would be fine to make them a bit more verbose.

The New Year is over and a new year is beginning, but I hope you will continue to support us.

Q.Which do you think about more often, the future or the past? A. Definitely the future! If you had to give priority to appetite or appearance, which would you choose?

Hello. This is Inishie Destiny from Seito Medical School. This time, the theme is "Which do you think about more: the future or the past?"

First of all, I have amnesia. I'm not kidding. When I'm engrossed in my hobby research, I forget if I had eaten a meal an hour ago. I don't care about the past, I only look to the present and the future. 

Now, I would like to tell you a little story. Which do you prioritize: satisfying your appetite or maintaining your appearance? For example, let's say you are in an environment where you can eat as much delicious steak or sushi as you want. Let's say you love that kind of food and can eat as much as you want. 

But sadly, the more people eat to satisfy their appetite, the fatter they become. There are often overweight people overseas, and this is the result of them choosing to satisfy their appetite rather than maintain their appearance. 

Here, I would like to think about the nature of appetite and beauty. Appetite is temporary, and no matter how delicious something is, you will hardly remember it the next day. Of course, there are some flavors that bring back memories, like the French food served at someone's wedding. The taste of your mother's cooking is also like that. 

On the other hand, maintaining your appearance has the advantage of lasting for a long time. If you start paying attention to your appearance, you can maintain your beauty for 5 to 10 years. Appetite is temporary and therefore stimulating. If you eat delicious food, you will not feel the need to worry about your weight.

However, physical beauty is a gradual stimulus that lasts for a long time, and is sustained by human relationships. In economics, this concept is called flow and stock. Appetite is a flow, a temporary desire, whereas physical beauty is a stock that can be accumulated. 

Surprisingly, if your lifestyle is bad, you may be able to look younger with just a little effort. On the other hand, your appetite may increase, but it will not decrease because you are prioritizing temporary pleasure. This is also the reason why the standard of living rises. 

Going back to the first topic, if I had to choose between being future-oriented or past-oriented, I would say I'm future-oriented. I would say that things that build up and keep getting younger, like physical beauty, are more important than things that don't remain in your memory once they're over, like appetite. 

In that sense, this blog says "study study," because the more you study, the more knowledge you accumulate. Future-oriented means accumulating what can be accumulated from the past to the present, and planning your life in a way that allows you to reap the benefits from that in the future. 

Here's a little bit of trivia. Some people find that eating the foods they like makes them gain weight. For these people, the advice is to save the last bite. Saving the last bite may give you the feeling that your meal is over and that your appetite has been satisfied before you've finished the whole meal. 

Some may argue that for a gourmet, the last bite is the best, but that bite is the deciding factor between being able to eat what you like and still maintain your figure, and becoming overweight or overweight. 

The last bite is important. Disposing of food waste may be a hassle, but it's one way to maintain your appetite and your appearance. The last bite. See you later.

Medical School Rewrite! 20230104 Before you study, let's have a strategy meeting with me! I have written my strategy in this article.

This rewrite represents my determination to take on the challenge of blogging.

Hello. This is Inishie Destiny from Seito Medical School. This rewrite is about how boldly I, who stayed up all night, can tackle the high ground of a blog. 

It's now 11:30am and almost lunchtime. What should I have for lunch? I'll dash to the convenience store after I finish writing this article. I sincerely hope that this medical school rewrite will unleash my potential. 

Well, in the original story, I'm talking about taking on number theory or quantum mechanics. No, that's fine. I'm motivated. But the point is, it's easier said than done.

I am eager to tackle the medical field, so I would like to boldly tackle number theory and quantum mechanics and deepen my research in medicine, mathematics, and physics. One thing I would like to try is changing the order in which I read textbooks.

I am promoting a new pattern of reading: read the first chapter, the table of contents, and the last chapter, then read the last chapter, then the sixth chapter, the fifth chapter, the fourth chapter, and so on, all the way to the first chapter. Writing a blog also requires knowledge. There are many ways to acquire knowledge, but the most cost-effective way is to read a textbook. 

Of course, reading Wiki and the like can also be considered meaningful in terms of reading.

First, let's have a strategy meeting before we start reading. As I said before, we'll read the first chapter, then the last chapter in reverse order, back to the first chapter, so that's fine for now. 

There may be things you don't understand during the process. What is this terminology? I don't understand this theory even after reading the explanation. You can take out an introductory book and look up each point before you start, but I think I would rely on Wikipedia. 

First of all, whether it's a textbook on number theory or physics, I think it's a good idea to get a rough idea of ​​the subject from Wikipedia. Of course, the main thing is the textbook, but it's also good to use Wiki or an introductory book as a sub.

I think you can learn a lot just by doing this. Output what you learn in a blog and keep a good memory and record.

Medical School Rewrite! 20230101 If you devote three hours a day to effort, what will happen in a dozen years?

For those of you who don't want to spend every day lazing around.

Hello. This is Inishie Destiny from Seito Medical School. I would like to start by telling you a story from my life. Allocate three hours a day to hard work. From my perspective, this is something I can confidently say I have continued to do for the past ten years.

Yes. I studied three hours a day for over ten years. In my case, I studied, but what I was able to do after ten years was that I immediately became able to write sentences.

I've been blogging for less than a year now, but thanks to the learning I've done under the guise of studying, I've come to understand the important points of anything I do. 

As with anything, there is a trick to winning. In human relationships, there is a theory in any sport that you should be proactive in talking to others. What I have been learning under the guise of studying has allowed me to accurately grasp how to make something go well when starting something new. 

Recently, I have been trying to study medicine, and I think about whether we use medical knowledge when we think about what nutrients we need. There are all kinds of recipes for carbohydrates, proteins, dietary fiber, vitamins, etc., but basically, we live on nutrients such as carbohydrates that can be broken down into smaller molecules.

If you've ever lived alone, you'll understand that a man like me who lives alone doesn't bother to cook for himself, and instead makes simple meals with pre-made bento boxes. One day, and this was recently, I thought to myself, "Isn't it okay if I don't eat meat, fish, or vegetables properly, as long as I'm getting the nutrients I need?"

Thinking about food from a medical perspective in terms of nutrients makes you think that if it's cheap and helps you maintain a healthy body, it might be okay to eat things that are closer to molecules than bento boxes, or rather, that such simple meals might be better for your health. 

Even if you're living alone and can't cook, it's fine to eat bento every meal, but that bento itself doesn't necessarily guarantee your health. Even if you think it's okay to eat a bento with lots of vegetables, wouldn't it be enough to drink liquid vegetable juice? And wouldn't liquid juice be less taxing on your stomach? 

If you study for three hours a day, every day, you will be able to write sentences like the one above easily and will also be able to look at food from a different perspective than usual.

I began to think that if I prioritized medicine, I could survive on a diet of only frozen broad beans, which contain plant-based protein (about 120 yen at convenience stores), and fruits rich in vitamins (frozen bags cost about 200 yen), with the added security of vegetable juice. 

The idea is that a light, plant-based diet is better for your body than heavy, fatty meat dishes. Some people may be resistant to the idea of ​​studying, but if you think of it as a way to gain new insights, there won't be many people who are opposed to it. 

Are the habits we take for granted and that we learn from our parents and teachers really correct? If we realize this, we will realize that our current habits are not the best, and that there is a higher level to improve.

Our habits are a collection of long-standing knowledge that has been established by our predecessors. However, this knowledge is not the best and there is nothing that can be improved upon, but rather it is the second best at the moment. Such knowledge can be improved with some ingenuity.

Times change, and so do the people who live with them. Our habits are based on knowledge from decades ago, and we face the challenge of whether that knowledge is fitting well into the current environment. 

I've been studying for a long time, and I thought that maybe I don't get much stimulation from new knowledge, but I was inspired by a book I bought just a few days ago. It's not just me who is making progress, but the whole world around me is also moving forward little by little. 

So, this time, I learned that studying this changes the way you see the world, and that as long as you get your nutritional intake, humans can live healthily without eating packed lunches, but just vegetable juice and frozen beans and fruit. 

I believe that society is more stable when it has diversity and a variety of ways of thinking. I, too, make sure to study three hours a day in order to generate new ideas.

It's almost time for the firefly light. In order to not get left behind by the flow of society and to lead it forward, we need to learn a little bit every day. For me, that's three hours a day.

This varies from person to person, so it doesn't matter if you're studying for a qualification or doing a sport as a hobby. If you have time to put in effort, you can make progress. To do this, make effort a habit. The fact that the habit of effort makes people win will continue to be the case, even as times change.

That's all. Thank you very much. This was the medical school rewrite. Happy New Year.