Friday, April 19, 2024

I tried to solve Fermat's last theorem! A legendary conundrum that remained unsolved for 350 years. by 天風 20231106

axa+bxb=cxc has an answer of 3×3+4×4=5×5, for example. However, Fermat's argument was that expressions with powers greater than axaxa+bxbxb=cxcxc, axaxaxa+bxbxbxb=cxcxcxc, and more do not have integer answers.


``It is impossible to divide a cubic number into two cubic numbers, or a 4th power into two 4th powers, and in general into the same power for any higher power than the 2nd power. I have discovered a truly amazing proof, but this space is too small to contain it.'' (The First Number Theory, Joseph H. Silverman)


In 1994, Andrew Wiles published a proof that all semistable elliptic curves with rational coefficients are modular. As a result, Fermat's prediction made 350 years ago became a reality.


(*) From here, I would like to write down the proof that I performed myself.


a^n+b^n=c^n (here, a^n means a is multiplied n times. If a^3, it is the same as axaxa) b^n=c^na^n

(Set as a=cd)

b^n=c^n-(cd)^n

=c^nc^n+du (Here, set (cd)^n=c^n-du)

b^n= du

If b=d then b^(n-1)=u

but d^(n-1)≠u


As a hint, a^3+b^3=(a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2), so (a^2-ab+b^2)≠(a+b)^2. Similarly, a^4+b^4 and a^5+b^5 do not become c^4 or c^5.

No comments:

Post a Comment

When making a proposal to your boss, take his or her opinion into account! Your opinions and positions become more important. 230111

  Hello. This is Inishitenmei from Seito Juku. This time, we will talk about how to get other people to join in. What do you do when you wan...